28.Aug.2010 Jean Paul Lacombe Diaz to be Returned to His Mother

I am totally thrilled!  For over 10 months, Jean Paul’s mother sought to find him and then have him returned to her.  Judge Sol Casseb III (San Antonio, Texas), who’s running for re-election, gave custody of the boy to dad under fraudulent conditions so dad could kidnap the little boy.  Here is the coverage on CNN about it when it happened:

Yesterday the news came from France that Berenice Diaz prevailed in the hearing before a panel of judges and will be getting Jean Paul back.  This is the second time Jean Paul’s father had kidnapped him and taken him to France.  It took Berenice about two years to get Jean Paul back the first time.  Let’s hope they put the corrupt bastard behind bars for a while so Jean Paul doesn’t have to fear being kidnapped again, or given away by another father-loving judge.


French court sides with Texas mom in custody fight

© 2010 The Associated Press

Aug. 27, 2010, 6:57AM

SAN ANTONIO — A Texas woman’s lawyer says a French court has granted her custody of her 11-year-old son who disappeared last year after being removed from a school bus in San Antonio.

Attorney Miguel Ortiz told KSAT-TV that the court Friday granted custody to Berenice Diaz. She and her ex-spouse, Jean Philippe Lacombe, who is from France, were in court Thursday in Marseille.

Ortiz says paperwork was being completed to return the boy, Jean Paul Lacombe, to his mother.

Law officers last October removed the boy from the school bus after the father allegedly used incomplete Mexican court documents to falsely claim he had custody.

The father faces Texas charges of kidnapping, aggravated perjury and interfering with child custody. Further details on the criminal case were not immediately available.

26.Aug.2010 Internet Trolls: Don and Jason P. Hoffman

Trolls Lawyers for Abuser WOS (waste of skin) Hal Richardson are cruising a lot of websites lately, thinking they belong to Claudine Dombrowski.  Rest assured, she is sitting back while the rest of the world expresses outrage.  I was the one writing notes at the January hearing in Topeka…oh there were a few of us.  Here’s a mighty fine video to enjoy, because I am nice like that.

Love, Nancy

Abuse Has Prolonged Effect on Mothers

This is from a study done at Ohio State University…from Psych Central:

Abuse Has Prolonged Effect on Mothers

By Rick Nauert PhD Senior News Editor
Reviewed by John M.Grohol, Psy.D. on August 25, 2010

Abuse Has Prolonged Effect on Mothers

Leaving a violent or controlling relationship does not provide immediate refuge for a mother’s mental health.

In fact, a woman’s mental health may actually get worse before it gets better, a new study suggests.

Researchers found that in the two years after the end of an abusive relationship, mothers showed poorer mental health, became more depressed and maintained high levels of anxiety. In those areas, they were no better off than women who stayed in abusive relationships.

However, abused mothers who had more social support fared better after the end of their relationship than did similar mothers with less help from friends and family.

“Our findings really help us understand how unstable those first few years are for mothers who leave violent or controlling relationships,” said Kate Adkins, lead author of the study, who did the work as a doctoral student at Ohio State University.

“Even though getting out of the relationship may be good in the long run, they first have to deal with multiple sources of stress, including financial problems, single parenting and sharing custody with the abuser.”

Adkins conducted the study with Claire Kamp Dush, assistant professor of human development and family science at Ohio State.

Their results appear online in the journal Social Science Research and will be published in a future print edition.

The findings don’t suggest that women shouldn’t leave abusive partners, Kamp Dush emphasized.

“What our results mean is that these women still need a lot of support and a lot of services even after they leave. Family members and friends may think things are OK because she has left the abuser. But she still needs support and she still needs social services,” Kamp Dush said.

The researchers used data from the Fragile Families and Child Well-being study, a project of Princeton and Columbia universities. They used data on about 2,400 mothers who were married to, or co-habiting with, the father of their child at the end of the first year of the three-study.

They separated the mothers into three groups: those who experienced no abuse, those in controlling relationships (in which fathers were extremely critical and insulting, and controlled her actions) and those in physically violent relationships. They also looked at whether those relationships continued or ended by the end of the three years.

In addition, women were tested for levels of depression and anxiety, and levels of social support and religious involvement.

Results showed that all women – including those in non-violent relationships who stayed with their partners throughout the study – showed higher levels of depression and anxiety by the end of the three years.

That was probably because of the nature of this sample, Adkins said. These were nearly all low-income and minority women who had just become mothers, so they were under a lot of stress, Adkins said.

However, those who stayed in violent and controlling relationships – and those who left such unions – showed significantly greater increases in depression and anxiety, compared to those left or who remained in non-violent relationships.

Why did women who left violent and controlling relationships continue to experience larger increases in depression and anxiety?

A key reason may have been that, because of the shared child, the mothers still had substantial contact with their abusers.

Findings showed that, of abused women whose relationship ended, about half talked to or saw the father once a week. Only about a quarter were in contact with him a few times a year or less.

“They might be going through a divorce, or working out child arrangements. Research shows that more than a third of women continue to experience physical abuse and 95 percent experience emotional abuse following the end of the relationship. All of this adds to the stress and anxiety they already feel,” Adkins said.

The one sliver of good news was that abused women who had the support of friends and family did not show as much depression and anxiety as did women without that level of support.

“After the relationship ends, that is when these mothers really need the protection and help of their family and friends,” Kamp Dush said.

Higher levels of religious involvement did not by itself protect abused mothers from depression and anxiety, the study found. However, it is possible that the religious involvement was associated with social support, and mothers received help and encouragement through people they met through their church activities, Adkins said.

Adkins, who is currently a family therapist working with domestic violence victims, said the results are consistent with what she sees in her practice.

“People often wonder why abused women don’t leave their partners,” she said. “But as this study shows, things aren’t necessarily better after you leave an abuser, at least right away. It’s a difficult process.”

But these results shouldn’t dissuade abused mothers from leaving their partners, particularly when there are safety concerns to themselves or to their children, she said.

“The number one reason to leave is safety, not only for the mothers but for their children as well. While things may not get better right away, we only looked at up to two years after the relationship ended. We’re not sure what happens after that,” Adkins said.

Source: Ohio State University

Dear Don

2009: A Judicial Guide to Child Safety in Custody Cases

National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges Family Violence Department

Page 12:
C. [§3.3] A Word of Caution about Parental Alienation

Under relevant evidentiary standards, the court should not accept testimony regarding parental alienation syndrome, or “PAS.” The theory positing the existence of PAS has been discredited by the scientific community.  In Kumho Tire v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999), the Supreme Court ruled that even expert testimony based in the “soft sciences” must meet the standard set in the Daubert case.  Daubert, in which the court re-examined the standard it had earlier articulated in the Frye case, requires application of a multi-factor test, including peer review, publication, testability, rate of error, and general acceptance. PAS does not pass this test. Any testimony that a party to a custody case suffers from the syndrome or “parental alienation” should therefore be ruled inadmissible and stricken from the evaluation report under both the standard established in Daubert and the earlier Frye standard.

The discredited “diagnosis” of PAS (or an allegation of “parental alienation”), quite apart from its scientific invalidity, inappropriately asks the court to assume that the child’s behaviors and attitudes toward the parent who claims to be “alienated” have no grounding in reality. It also diverts attention away from the behaviors of the abusive parent, who may have directly influenced the child’s responses by acting in violent, disrespectful, intimidating, humiliating, or discrediting ways toward the child or the other parent. The task for the court is to distinguish between situations in which the child is critical of one parent because they have been inappropriately manipulated by the other (taking care not to rely solely on subtle indications) , and situations in which the child has his or her own legitimate grounds for criticism or fear of a parent, which will likely be the case when that parent has perpetrated domestic violence. Those grounds do not become less legitimate because the abused parent shares them, and seeks to advocate for the child by voicing his or her concerns.

Love, Nancy

25.Aug.2010 Former Michigan NOW Officer in Jail for Trying to Protect Her Children

What a nightmare.  I have heard many stories like this, but the trying to post bond issue is weird.  And of course, this is a fellow NOW sister, which makes me even more pissed off.  This is the news I received, when and if I can give more details, they will follow…hat tip to another fellow NOW sister for this:

Christine, former ACTION VP of Michigan NOW has been arrested for custodial interference.

She is in Kalamazoo County Jail.

Her bond is $5,000, but… the MICHIGAN bond company told her dad they can’t get her out.  They in all their years have NEVER heard of this… she can’t be bailed out until she is picked up by IOWA district attorney and taken to IOWA. (She is in risk of losing her job because of this).

The Dad caused a problem in IOWA at his children’s school that caused a lock down.  He brought a bloody chicken to school and threatened the principle but they did not have him arrested .  Christine did not want to send the children back out of fear due to that event.

Her dad said that the international BOND company NEVER heard of this where they refused to let her out until she is in IOWA.  They have calls in to the district attorney as to why; they are not responding.

The children have been sent back to DAD.

Please keep these children and their mother Christine in your thoughts and prayers.

Kansas Male Chauvinist Pig: Judge J. Patrick Walters of Wichita

UPDATE (8/26/10): Today is Women’s Equality Day.  Send Judge Walters a “Happy Women’s Equality Day” email:  jwalters@dc18.org<strong>jwalters@dc18.org</strong>

During a hearing yesterday in a Sedgwick County Courtroom, mother Tammy Youngquist sought to have contact with her two very young daughters.  She hasn’t seen them in months.  As most mothers who have been run into the ground financially by the abusive ex, she motioned the court pro se….without a lawyer.  Judge J. Patrick Walters refused to entertain anything in the motion she put forward, and when Tammy was quoting something in Kansas Constitution about rights of women, Assmunch Walters asked “Women have rights?“  Then he left the court room.

So the ex (they weren’t even married) continues to keep total control of the little girls and won’t let them see their own mother.  Won’t even let her see a picture of them while they were in court.  Tammy’s older son was “allowed” by BOS (bag of smegma) Shawn Jones, who was alleged to have sexually abused one of the young daughters, to see his sisters’ pictures, and the boy cried.  Control freaks like BOS Shawn Jones are known to try and control access to anything to do with his property (as he thinks of them as), as they make excellent pawns in the sick game of “keep away.”  He’s so lucky to have Chauvenist Pig Judge Walters right there by his side to let him continue the game.  God help these little girls.

There are no plans for their mother to ever see them again.  But they are promising to try and put her in jail next month for child support.  Bravo BOS Shawn, you would make our Asshole of the Month Club if we had one.  You are an embarrassment to me as a veteran of the military…you wear an Officers uniform, you take two little girls from their mother, one who was born in the hospital when you were out messing with another woman.  You and the “replacement mom” (wife #4?) make buckets of money next to what Tammy makes as a part time waitress.  Shame on you.  Your daughters (and this I know personally) will end up damning you for keeping them from their mother and siblings.

See what others say about Judge Patrick Walters, on The Wall of Shame by P & C Justice:

Judge Patrick Walters, here in Sedgwick county needs to be mentioned on your wall of shame, Judge Walters is NOT following the law. He is handing children over to the alleged abusers, he is denying protective parents a right to see their child/children. Kansas statute reads that a parent is entitled to visitation unless visitation would cause danger to the child. Well, in a recent case and others Judge Walters took away parenting time from a mother because she reported abuse. He stated that she was the abuser, how dare he say such thing, this is why so many children are dying because of Judges like Pat Walters. Lets not forget about Daytona Robertson, when the mother asked to have her daughter protected, and the abuse investigated and Judge Anthony Powell took away parenting time of mom and put her on supervised visits and gave Dad sole custody, then just a few months later little Daytona died from abuse in Dads home, Dad didn’t abuse the child but it was in Dad’s home NOT moms. Judge Patrick Walters needs to be removed from the bench, he is a true danger to children of abuse, children who rely on Judges to keep them safe. Judge Patrick Walters also has taken other children away from mom’s after abuse allegations and put the children in foster care, once again how dare him traumatize these children and take them away from the ONE parent who didn’t abuse them and place them with STRANGERS, NO MORE JUDGE WALTERS, you don’t deserve the HONOR of being a Sedgwick County Judge.

The Outrage Continues: U.S. House and Foreign Agencies Now Know About Daughter and Claudine Dombrowski

More are coming to know the injustice that happened on August 20th in a court room in Topeka, Kansas. Welcome to the U.S. House of Representatives.   Foreign agencies are coming too.  (The President of the United States knows too).  When I stood in front of the White House on Mother’s Day this year with some of the mothers, and in the days after, it was amazing to listen to foreign tourist express shock that this could happen in America.  IT DOES.

Once Claudine’s supporters weren’t around, Judge David Debenham did a 180 degree turn and gagged her (and he was spewing “First Amendment” rights when we were there in January). Abuser BOS (bag of smegma) Hal Richardson has bullied Daughter and scared her into parroting what is required to keep herself safe. And Abuser BOS Hall Richardson thus continues his abuse on Claudine, as he has done for years. He has broke the court order of January 2010 67 times, and Judge David Debenham let him get away with it. Don’t they punish judges for things like that in Kansas? I have another judge in Kansas that is just as bad (grab your barf bags)…that is the next post.

24.Aug.2010 Violence Against Women Justified?

When children witness domestic violence, they start to believe it is acceptable.  The Department of Justice has stated they don’t even have to witness it…they just have to be in the same household to be considered as witnessing.  When an abuser gets custody of children from their victim, the children get validation, thanks to family court and the associated corrupt bastards, that it is acceptable to beat a parent, then take the children to live with the perpetrator.  So this study is no surprise given the sad shape of family courts worldwide, and the bias against mothers.

What is shocking is the large numbers of children who believe hitting a woman is justified.  Ugggh!  From the BBC:

Violence against women is justified, says pupil study

playground fight

Most of the children questioned believed violence was often justified

A study of schoolchildren has found that most of those questioned thought violence towards women was acceptable if there was a reason behind it.

The majority of the pupils said it was justified if the woman had an affair, or if she was late in making the tea.

The study by a researcher from Edinburgh Napier University also suggested that girls expect to curtail ambitions once they are married.

The research involved 89 primary seven children at five Glasgow primaries.

They were asked to consider whether or not a man was justified in punching his partner when he found out she had had an affair.

Nearly all of the children thought that the woman deserved to be hit.

In another scenario, about 80% of the children said a man had cause to slap his partner because she did not have the dinner ready on time.

Researcher Nancy Lombard described the findings as “worrying” because the youngsters had naturalised and normalised violent behaviour.

She said: “The children didn’t agree with violence, but gave reasons to try to justify it if the woman had done something ‘wrong’.

“The old saying of ‘If he pulls your pigtails it means he likes you’, translates into violence in adulthood which girls accept as normal.”

Narrow expectations

The study also suggested that girls expected to modify their behaviour and narrow expectations once they were married and had children.

One of the girls said: “I want to be a dancer or a doctor.”

But she added: “When I grow up I’m going to have two babies and work part-time in the shop down the road.”

Ms Lombard said that sexual stereotypes were limiting and modifying girls’ behaviour to accommodate boys and men.

She said: “All the girls said they don’t get much of the playground because the boys dominate the space.

“They are still told they can’t play football because they are a girl.”

Ms Lombard called for work with children to start early to encourage respectful relationships, challenge violent behaviour and break down gender stereotypes.

The findings of the study will be presented at a conference in Glasgow on Wednesday which has been jointly organised between Scottish Women’s Aid and Napier University.

Edinburgh Women’s Aid spokeswoman Suzanne Moran called for more education on violence towards women: “These findings, in effect, reflect that these attitudes are still widely held in Scotland.

“Studies like these reveal that there is still much to be done to eradicate ingrained beliefs that women are to blame for violence perpetrated against them.”

23.Aug.2010 Daughter Dombrowski: The President of the USA Now Knows WTF is Going On

We didn’t have to go to him, he came to us (he was on the post at 6:49 pm EDT, for 8 minutes 44 seconds).  We are only hoping now that something will happen.  There are many mothers in custody hell, and we have to start somewhere to make things right.  To make things just and fair.  Let’s start right here and reunite Daughter with her mother, Claudine Dombrowski, and end the hell of ten years they have had to endure from corrupt and money-hungry court officials and lawyers.  Daughter is threatened to say what daddy Hal Richardson wants her to say…we know this.  We know her heart and she wants to see her mother.

Stop corrupt lawyers like Don Hoffman and Jason P. Hoffman of Topeka, Kansas, which use junk science, lies, and paid experts to spew their money-making venom.  Stop uneducated, biased, untruthful Guardian ad Litem M. Jill Dykes, a friend of daddy Hal Richardson, from destroying children’s lives.  I myself was a child victim of horrible people like this and I can tell you it is life-affecting what these people do.  My mother didn’t get me back from her abuser (my father) until I was almost 17 years old.  Let’s not let that happen to Daughter.

 

Please Mr. President, stop supporting and funding just fathers and start supporting parents who have lost their children to their abusers.

Read the post the President was reading on our site here, part of which was authored by Anne Caroline Drake on her website.

 

Worldwide Outrage Over Custody Tragedy: Daughter Dombrowski Needs Her Mother

People are outraged everywhere.  The last time 15 year old Daughter called to cancel her two hour Sunday visit she is allowed each week with her mother, she was crying on the phone and said she couldn’t come.  Abuser WOS (waste of skin) Hal Richardson was yelling in the background, and Daughter cried more.  Dear Claudine told her daughter it was okay, that everything would be okay.  That was it.  After that, not even a phone call to cancel, Hal Richardson failed to produce Daughter at the Topeka Police Station as he was ordered to do.  Nothing.  And the court let him get away with all 67 violations of this court order on August 20th when they went to court.

This girl is suffering, and being threatened with what to say, and she needs help immediately.  We may need to get ahold of the United Nations or NATO to seek help if we don’t get action soon from the Kansas Legislature.  I plan on calling Lynn Rosenthal, Obama’s White House Advisor on Domestic Violence, at the White House today and discuss this with her, as she and Department of Justice personnel have been looking at ways to stop abusers from getting custody.  Please call her too and let her know you are disgusted that an abusive criminal could keep a mother and daughter apart for ten years, thanks to money-hungry court personnel and lawyers.  Her phone number at the White House is 202-456-1414, and ask for Lynn Rosenthal.

From Anne Caroline Drake’s Website:

Injustice in Oz: Are Judge David Debenham and GAL M. Jill Dykes Acting in the Best Interest of the Child or Engaged in a Cover-up?

Posted by Anne Caroline Drake on August 22, 2010 · 11 Comments

Quantcast

Claudine Dombrowski and her daughter got caught up in a Kansas-style tornado of injustice and pretext on Friday.  There are so many abusive narcissistic wizards in this courtroom catastrophe that I felt like Dorothy in Oz when I heard what happened.

You Decide:  Incompetence, Pretext, Cover-Up, or Best Interests of the Child?

In the 14 years this case has been pending, Ms. Dombrowski has gotten just one day of justice back in January when she and Rights for Mothers‘ founder Nancy Carroll packed the courtroom.  Judge David Debenham allowed her the First Amendment right to shine a bright light on the injustice perpetrated by Hal Richardson and facilitated by GAL M. Jill Dykes.

GAL is the legal term for guardian ad litem.  These attorneys are appointed by the court to protect the best interests of the child in custody battles.  They are supposed to remain neutral and protect and advocate for the child.  It’s a sweet gig for attorneys.

Pretext is the legal term for blowing smoke up the court’s ass.  It’s a nice way of describing a courtroom that operates more like a mushroom farm.  As you may know, mushrooms thrive when they are covered in shit and kept in the dark.

Sealed Records, Gag Orders, and Closed Court

Judge David Debenham’s first order of business on Friday was to clear the courtroom of witnesses to the proceedings.  He claimed it was in the best interest of the child.  Then, he confiscated Ms. Dombrowski’s cell phone, ordered the records sealed, and issued a gag order.  This is from the court docket:

Court finds that Dr. Rodeheffer’s report of May 18, 2010, has been published on the website of Respondent. Court suspends Respondent’s parenting time pending final hearing in this matter. Respondent’s counsel is to review Respondent’s cell phone to determine if there are images of report on Respondent’s cell phone – Respondent’s phone time with minor child to continue but to Petitioner’s home phone. Due to publication of report on the Internet, which deals with minor child, Court finds that there is a privacy interest of the minor child that is central to these proceedings and outweighs the public interest and orders that the files, records, and transcripts of the case be sealed until further order of the Court. J. Dykes to do order.

Before I rip into the pretext and cover-up in this order, this is what Steven Brown, executive director of the Rhode Island affiliate of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) had to say about a Rhode Island judge who issued a similar order:

This court order is a blatant violation of the First Amendment.  If she believes she is being treated unfairly, or if she just wishes to make people aware of her case, she should be able to do so free of a court-ordered gag rule.

Was Hal Richardson held in contempt of court for routinely denying visitation between his daugher and her mother?  Hell no!

By the time he and GAL Dykes got done manipulating the judge, Ms. Dombrowski was the one in the hot seat. . .for shining a bright light on the truth. . .for exercising the very same First Amendment rights the judge guaranteed last January.

Claudine after being raped and beaten in 2000

Is GAL M. Jill Dykes Incompetent, Corrupt, or Clueless?

Before the hearing on Friday, I sent GAL Dykes a professional courtesy e-mail message.  A part of me was hoping she might make better decisions if she was apprised of the dynamics of PAS (parental alienation syndrome), domestic violence, and manipulation of the legal system as an instrument of abuse.  I also addressed my very legitimate concerns about a minor child residing in a house with a child’s coffin as a coffee table and a gun on the wall with a convicted criminal as custodial parent.

Her GAL-pal Rene M. Netherton sent me a threatening e-mail message in response.  I guess I was supposed to be intimidated into silence.  I wasn’t.

Instead, I was dumbfounded that licensed professionals would engage in behavior more common for junior high kids.  The tone and tenor of her comments let me know I was dealing with an abusive narcissist.  They can’t handle criticism and project their own evil intent onto others.  It explains why they are unable to distinguish between perpetrator and victim.

Ms. Netherton was GAL in this case before Ms. Dykes.  She didn’t respond to my concerns about Hal Richardson’s criminal record or choice of decor.

Best Interests of the Child

Yes, folks that’s a child’s coffin.  The photo doesn’t show the gun on the wall.  Y’all have sounded off with your concerns about the safety of a child residing in such a hostile environment.  GALs Netherton and Dykes don’t get it.  I’m not terribly surprised.  Ms. Netherton misses simple stuff like the fact that “privileged” is spelled incorrectly in her boilerplate.

Richardson Has an Extensive Criminal Record

According to Stop Family Violence, the abuse of Ms. Dombrowski and the minor child started when she was four months pregnant and discovered that Mr. Richardson had lied to her about being married.  He beat her.  As you can see, she was sporting a black eye when she gave birth to the child in 1994.

On February 18, 1995, Mr. Richardson was arrested for domestic battery and damage to property.  A no contact order was issued on February 21 which he immediately violated.  His bond was revoked when he failed to appear.  Shawnee County (KS) Court Services Officer Mary Kelly sent a memo on March 14 to Judge James P. Buchele regarding sentencing and probation:

Mr. Richardson has been placed on probation five times in the past 15 years.  I do not believe he is a good candidate for probation. . .I recommend. . .a psychological evaluation and follow all recommendations for treatment.  [emphasis added]

Nevertheless, Judge Buchele let him off with a slap on the wrist in a plea deal.  The domestic battery charges were reduced to disorderly conduct and the damage to property charge was dismissed.  Although he was ordered to get a psychological evaluation, he never did.  He was released from probation on June 13, 1996 after getting expelled from a court-ordered batterers group:

  • 3/6/95:  Fred Eisland:. . .marriage that ended in divorce and there was some violence there and he and his current partner are fighting.
  • 5/29/96:  . . .rude and disrespectful to female cofacilitator as evidenced by his combative stance, his repeated interruptions, his sexist language, his monopolization of the group with his loud voice, and his refusal to accept responsibility for his own actions.  Appears to be inappropriate for group.  JSM
  • 6/5/96:  No show
  • 6/10/96:  . . .client very disruptive during group. . .constantly challenging the structure of the program.  Client attempted to use the group as a forum to discuss his negative views of the local judicial system.  Client refuses to see himself as anything but a victim.  Very inappropriate actions for a group setting.
  • 6/11/96:  Called PO and client to tell them that he had graduated as far as I was concerned.  He only has 17 sessions, but is causing too much trouble with his mouth.  Terminated, with cause.  Will not be accepted back.  JSM  [emphasis added]

Please visit Anne Caroline Drake’s website for the rest of this excellent report.

22.Aug.2010 ATTENTION KANSAS LEGISLATURE: Claudine and Daughter Dombrowski Need Your Help

Tonight a letter will be coming your way, detailing the miscarriage of justice that this Topeka mother and daughter has endured in Kansas courts.  Please consider carefully how best you can help.  Claudine has been a strong voice for battered and abused mothers, having testified before State Rep Mike Kiegerl‘s (R-Olathe) Joint Committee on Children’s Issues in December 2009.

Claudine has been gagged, denied documents to her case, denied parenting time (AGAIN), and even had her phone confiscated from her.  She came to court with 67 violations of the last court order of daddy Hal Richardson keeping Daughter from seeing her mother.  I was in court with Claudine in January when the order was issued to finally allow visitation, and Judge David Debenham (Shawnee County Court, phone number (785) 233-8200 ext. 4203 ) looked Richardson in the eyes and pointed to him and told him he WILL follow the court’s order.  He didn’t, and the motion to find him in contempt was dismissed as soon as Claudine didn’t have all her supporters there.

Your constituents, the voters of Kansas, the mothers of Kansas must have your support.  Another is waiting in the wings to be stomped on in Wichita on Tuesday (Jones vs. Youngquist  Case no. 06-DM 3626).  A father, Shawn Jones, who allegedly sexually abused his young daughter, has kept the children from their mother, Tammy Youngquist.  She has not seen them in months.  This is the abuser’s way of punishing mothers, and courts gladly help.  Scientific studies show that children rarely lie about sexual abuse, yet child protection workers constantly disregard allegations if they come from children of a broken home.  WAKE UP AND REALIZE CHILDREN ARE IN PAIN HERE.  CHILDREN ARE BEING ABUSED AND CHILDREN ARE BEING RAPED AND KANSAS COURTS ARE HELPING THE PERPETRATORS.

This is from Earl Glynn, the Kansas Watchdog:

Claudine Dombrowski

Claudine Dombrowski:  An abused mom victimized again by the Kansas CourtsClaudine Dombrowski: An abused mom victimized again by the Kansas Courts

Read details in written statement.

This is an truly incredible story that should never have happened in America.

Parts of the Kansas Judicial system should be disciplined for how it has victimized Ms. Dombrowski, who was an abused mom.

Instead of quotes from the audio, please consult these pages that document Dombrowski’s long and difficult battle to protect her daughter:

As you view these photos keep in mind that the court awarded FULL CUSTODY of their daughter to the “man” who did this to Claudine.

State Rep Bill Otto: “No crime? You haven’t been guilty of anything? This is a court order that says you can’t go to any school functions?”

“I was under court order till 2004 to not even call the police after I was being beaten because … I was not ‘co-parenting’”

Dombrowski: “These friends of the court make recommendations to the judge. The parents … don’t have a right to see these documents. They do this behind closed doors.”

Otto: (To Secretary Jordan): “You have no rights as a parent …?”

Secretary Don Jordan: “This would be something extreme … I’m not familiar with the situation.”

Otto: “Can a judge do that? … Is that legal… ?”

Jordan: “Under the right circumstances … I hesitate to speculate.”

Sen. Roger Reitz: “This is something that only … the judicial system can really answer … It would be helpful … to have someone … representing the judicial system … to give us some ideas how this could happen.”

Dombrowski: “When you are a victim of domestic violence, and suddenly there’s a child involved, the typical …. power of control is that ‘I’ll take your children from you’. They will and they can the way the laws are setup.” …

“I was told that I’m not to talk to my daughter about the violence. That’s why I don’t see her. That’s why I see her supervised. He was criminally convicted. “

“When women try to get away from people who hurt them … I heard somebody say it’s really hard to believe you won’t call the police … I tell people not to contact the police, because as soon as you walk into court with a DV (domestic violence) and children, you’re already cutting your throat. You will lose your children. That’s the way it is right now.”

“… on the 16th of this month I’ll probably go to jail for breaking the gag order and talking about [being the victim of] violence as it relates to my case.”

Reitz: “… someone ought to be able to deal with this in a way that would address her problem. It doesn’t seem like we’ve done the right thing with regards to this little niche of the law.”

Dombrowski: “The criminal convictions are completely tossed aside and they don’t have any bearing on the family court … The eight criminal convictions that my ex had before getting custody of my daughter were completely dropped [in family court]“

Chair Kiegerl: “I cannot believe that abuse is totally ignored. I cannot believe you can prohibit a person from speaking about their own case.”

“The one thing [where] … I disagree with you is abuse should always be reported.”

State Rep Peggy Mast (R-Emporia): “Domestic violence is a control issue. Sexual abuse is a control issue. Is there any correlation between domestic violence and sexual abuse? Why is that not something that is considered when we take someone to [family] court that has a history of domestic violence?”

Dombrowski: “Yes. That is something I’ve asked myself for 16 years. … It comes back to the family court that has a veil of immunity. … They don’t fully understand the impact of the violence. What battered women have … if they report the abuse, then they’re failing to protect their child … if they don’t report the abuse, they’re still failing to protect their child. So, both ways, they’re going to lose their children …”

For anybody who abuses their wife … [from] a 1996 presidential task force … there is a 70% increase that those children will be abused and/or sexually abused after there’s been battery with the mother.

Sen. Oletha Faust-Goudea: “In 2004 …. I talked with the homicide department in Sedgwick County…. During that time there had been 21 homicides in Sedgwick County and 18 were due to domestic violence …”

“A lot of women do make those phone calls and unfortunately, sometimes it ends in their death.” …

“I want to apologize to you for being treated like a pedophile … not being able to go to a music concert.”

“I commend you for what you’re doing.”

Dombrowski: “I have not talked to my daughter in 10 years [except] for the confines of supervised visits. I’m not allowed to talk to her about anything. All she knows is what her dad has told her.”

See this video:  Abused Mom Wants Unsupervised Visits with Daughter

Others have indicated a desire to help.  I have uploaded the email addresses for the Kansas House here and the Kansas Senate here.  This is just the beginning.

Don’t Let Financial Abuse Be the Reason You Stay

 This is from mycentraljersey.com:

Rutgers professor studies ‘economic abuse’ as tactic to control women in relationship

By RICK MALWITZ • STAFF WRITER • July 25, 2010

RUTGERS — When Judy L. Postmus was operating a women’s center in Florida, she heard the stories of many women in abusive relationships, and those stories often involved physical abuse.

But there was another element to many stories not normally associated with domestic violence: economic abuse.

“Ask people about abuse and economics abuse is way down on the list,” said Postmus, an assistant professor and director of the Center on Violence Against Women and Children at the Rutgers University School of Social Work.

“Money is a controlling type of tactic. Financial reasons are one reason why some women do not leave an abusive relationship,” said Postmus, who recently completed a study of 120 women and one man who participated in an economic curriculum prepared for victims of domestic abuse.

The study, funded by The Allstate Foundation, is titled, “Moving Forward Through Money Management.”

The curriculum addresses such subjects as how to budget, how to deal with the misuse of financial records and how individuals can protect themselves financially while involved in an abusive relationship.

The abuse can include such components as controlling paychecks, using credit cards without permission, putting contractual obligations in a spouse’s name and then abandoning the obligations, and gambling with family assets.

The abuse can affect a person at the workplace. An abusive spouse, according to Postmus, “Can interfere with her ability to work, to try to get her fired. It’s all tied in with control,” she said.

The National Coalition Against Domestic Violence estimated that domestic violence results in between $3 billion and $5 billion lost annually in absenteeism, decreased productivity, and health and safety costs.

What the economic-abuse curriculum does, said Postmus, is give victims confidence as they grapple with financial issues. “Understanding economic abuse and how it may affect their lives is one way of confronting the issue,” said Postmus.

“Financial reasons are the number one reason why women stay (in an abusive relationship) and why they go back,” said Ana Vega, the economic justice coordinator for the New Jersey Coalition for Battered Women.

The challenge of recovering financially has been made more difficult, with weakness in the national economy.

“It affects people on so many levels,” said Vega, of the economy’s malaise. “It makes it harder to re-establish your life elsewhere, to get new employment.”

One of the biggest challenges, said Vega, is lifting a credit score that may have suffered during an abusive relationship.

The study by Postmus, conducted with Sara Plummer, an instructor at the Rutgers University School of Social Work, measured the success of the foundation’s curriculum.

Ninety percent of those who participated in the survey said they were satisfied with the curriculum, 88 percent established financial goals, more than 75 percent established a budget and 22 percent set up a retirement fund.

The curriculum is available at clicktoempower.org.

The National Coalition Against Domestic Violence has also prepared a financial literacy program, available at ncadv.org.

21.Aug.2010 Databases Track Your Every Move and More

This is from Kim Komando (the Digital Goddess). I was listening to her radio show this weekend, and she was talking about background checks. I was looking around her website and thought this would be good information to pass along.

Ever wonder just how much information about you is contained in databases and on the Internet? Here’s a hint. It’s much more than you think.

If your telephone number is published, a simple Google search can turn up your home address, phone number, and a map to your front door. Everyone knows that. But there are other databases and sites that contain intimate details of your life.

Specialty reports let potential insurers check your prescription history. Retailers can view your purchase returns history. And your employment and rental history are also online.

This information may be incorrect. It can haunt you when you apply for a job, credit or health insurance. So, it’s a good idea to do a background check on yourself from time to time.

The Fair Credit Reporting Act lets you request free credit reports once a year. You can also request a report if you’ve been denied credit based on information it contains. And, you can request that any errors be corrected.

Credit Reports

Credit reports are widely used to verify your credit-worthiness. Experian, Equifax and TransUnion are the three main reporting agencies. You can request your free report by visiting AnnualCreditReport.com. You can request reports from all three agencies.

Personal Information Reports

Personal Information Reports include information on your employment and tenant history. They also contain information on liens and judgments, voter registration and more. This information is used for background screening.

Start by requesting a report from LexisNexis. Then, request your background screening report from Acxiom. You can also request information from Acxiom’s directory and fraud detection service; however, there is a $5 charge for that.

You should also request a Full File Disclosure from ChoicePoint, a LexisNexis company. The information will differ from your LexisNexis report.

Insurance Reports

Your ChoicePoint Full File Disclosure will include home and auto insurance claims. But you’ll also want to order a report from Insurance Services Office.

Have you applied for individual health or life insurance in the past seven years? Then, you may have a file at the Medical Information Bureau. It is designed to protect insurers from fraudulent or incomplete applications.

Your file may include information on medical conditions and tests. It could also include driving history and dangerous hobbies or professions. You can request your consumer file from MIB. However, it may not have one on you.

Your prescription drug information may also be available to insurance companies. IntelliScript and MedPoint compile information on drugs, including refills and dosages. It can go back five years.

Checking Reports

Banks often use ChexSystems to vet account applications. Your report may reflect accounts that have been mishandled. For example, it shows if you have had excessive overdrafts.

Retailers use TeleCheck for check verification. It gathers information on returned checks and check fraud.

Employment history

The Work Number collects employment and income information. The data comes from employers. Abso also gathers employment-related information.

These companies may not have information on you. Still, you’ll want to request copies of your files from both companies.

Tenant history and utilities reports

A number of companies gather tenant information. The information can include evictions and disputes with landlords.

Your tenant history may be available from one or more databases. Check with First Advantage SafeRentRentBureau and Tenant Data Services.

The National Consumer Telecom and Utilities Exchange provides information to utility companies. It stores information on defaulted and fraudulent accounts.

Other reports

The Social Security Administration sends yearly Social Security statements. Your statement shows your Social Security earnings history. It also includes estimated benefit payments. You can request a copy of your report at any time.

The Retail Equation is designed to prevent fraudulent and abusive returns. Information provided may prevent you from returning an item to a store. In that case, request a copy of your return activity report.

Teletrack collects subprime credit information. It is used by payday loan companies.

CentralCredit is a credit bureau used by the gaming industry. Casinos use it when extending credit to guests.

The process for requesting a specialty report varies from database to database. You may need to call the company or mail a form. Be prepared to disclose your Social Security number and current address. You may also need to submit copies of documents to prove your identity.

Update from California Protective Parents Association: Custody Evaluator Training, Get Ready for Washington D.C. Action!

From our friend Connie:

Dear Friends,

1.  There is a critical need for help on legislation THIS WEEKEND.  Please email me at cppa001@aol.comcppa001@aol.com if you are interested in and able to send 15 faxes.  I’ll send you a letter template.

2. In mid-September, the annual  International Violence, Abuse and Trauma conference will be held in San Diego. It is a great networking opportunity.  Meera Fox of Child Abuse Solutions will present a 3 day evaluator training prior to the conference. Dr. Geraldine Stahly will present the protective parent research on Wednesday.  If your funds are limited, contact IVAT  to volunteer. www.ivatcenters.org and www.abusesolutions.com for evaluator training

3. We had such a great time on Mothers Day that we decided to return to Washington DC in early October, which is Domestic Violence Awareness month to continue our Mothers Movement. On Friday Oct 1 at 11:00 am we will hold a press conference in front of the US Department of Justice to request an investigation into family court endangerment of children.  Afterwards, we will march to the Senate Buildings to meet with Senate aides and request Congressional hearings . Please contact me at cppa001@aol.comcppa001@aol.com if you want to participate –be sure to say what state your case is in, and what state you live in. Packets and talking points will be provided. It would be helpful to bring several copies of a 1 page summary of your case. We will end the day with a vigil at the Sewall Belmont house – the suffragists’ headquarters 100 years ago. On Saturday Oct 2 we will gather at the White House again for a vigil and speakout.  Attire is white with white Tshirts saying Mothers of Lost Children or Mothers of Lost Children Supporter. We will have some Tshirts available. More information can be found at www.mothers-of-lost-children.com. Many thanks to Renee Beeker for this great article: http://www.nowfoundation.org/issues/family/family_law_newsletter_summer2010.pdf

4. The National Coalition Against Domestic Violence conference in Anaheim was fabulous! There was an entire track on custody, including talks by two judges who are appalled at the harm being done to mothers and children in family courts. Mo Hannah and Barry Goldstein presented the well-attended plenary session.  White House advisor Lynn Rosenthal spent over 2 hours listening to family court litigants to see how the  Federal government can help us. The  most heartening part is that the NCADV is strongly with us, as they understand that battered mothers losing custody sets the domestic violence movement back 30 years.

Meta